topic was THIS HOUSE WOULD BAN EUTHANESIA
-'mercy' killing
-painless quick dying through injection
-patient is terminally ill
-dr death
-murder
- better to die than to suffer
- live longer
- wait for possible cure
- doctor's role--prevent suffering OR to save lives ( you all decide)
rules:
-3 person per grp
-presentation/your opinion
-3-5minutes(:
there is a debate going on to show a real debate: of euthanesia too(:
ms wong came to the classroom b4 the debate started, which kinda shocked me..haha=D
well, but she went away slightly b4 the debate had ended, about 11am. l0l!!
so our grp chose to BAN EUTHANESIA
some of the points:
-if euthanesia is allowed, doctors are encourage not ot give the best medical care and attention to the patient
-when there is an extremely painful disease, it would result ion euthanesia, patient waould want to end their lives
-patient is afraid of of financial burden, medical care is expensive, so it would lead to euthanesia, not caring of their own lives
-patient may not able to afford euthanesia
-there would be potential abuse of euthanesia
-take euthanesia against their own will
-if euthanesia is legalised, government would then not pay attention to it
medical care withdrawn without consent
-euthanesia could be banned in stages, so the government can handle it better
-patients could be pressurized to to convinced them to take euthanesia
-alternative for taking euthanesia: painkillers to help them cope with their illness((:
all the grps have to go and present it): haha
bye!!
No comments:
Post a Comment